Now a days the Egyptian parliament is being referred to as the revolutionary parliament or the parliament of the revolution and other shit. These names are really baffling to me, I really want to know why the hell its revolutionary how in gods name did they earn that nick name; because to tell you the truth when ever I watch the sessions on TV what comes to mind is a bunch of hens sitting together in their pen and clucking at each other, and the Katatny is the turkey that is failing to keep order. I want to know since the elections did they take any sort of revolutionary decision, did they ever side with the revolution? No they didn't so, stop calling them revolutionary because they sure as hell aren't.
My first reason in not believing in the parliament is that it was elected under military rule, and SCAF will never allow anyone other than their dogs to enter the parliament, and if they did the members of parliament wont have any real power. Who are SCAF's lackeys? they are the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and Salafies. The few other members of the parliament who are obviously against SCAF were included so the general public wont notice that there is something wrong and that the parliament consists of only the so called islamists, since they aren't that popular.
The fact remains the the MB along with the Salafies are obviously on SCAF's side. Lets take for example today's session, when some of the members of parliaments (MB and Salafiies) denied that the police where using bird shot against the protesters. Also when another member said that the protesters in front of the Ministry of Interior are being paid 200 LE a day along with 2 meals and Tramadol pills to destroy the country. Lets not forget the legendary session after the Ultras massacre when they decided to do send a fact finding committee to investigate what happened and nothing else, this is SCAF's style in dealing with anything; they didn't take any revolutionary decision like for example impeaching SCAF which they could have done and they would have been backed by the Egyptians.
As I said before SCAF wont give any real power to their opposition, and its very clear that the MB and Salafy members of the parliament are on SCAF's side. This raises a whole other issue of whether the parliamentary elections were fraudulent or not. I totally believe that the elections were fraudulent to some extent, the number of votes for all the candidates was tampered with. Votes for the Salafies and MB were increases while votes for the opposition were decreased so they will only form a minority of the parliament.
Some people may ask why did SCAF agree then to the parliamentary elections? the answer is easy, its to shut us the hell up. Did you ever see a kid crying and just being plain noisy that he's getting everyone's attention? then the kids mum gives him a lollipop to shut him up and it works the kid stops crying and is happy. Well we are the kid and our treat was the parliament
I don't believe in the Egyptian parliament and I will never back them up; for this reason I completely refuse the idiotic suggestion that after we bring SCAF down we hand over the power the parliament. Yes civil disobedience will begin on February 11th, hopefully it will work and it will be the end of SCAF but we will not hand over rule to the parliament.
My first reason in not believing in the parliament is that it was elected under military rule, and SCAF will never allow anyone other than their dogs to enter the parliament, and if they did the members of parliament wont have any real power. Who are SCAF's lackeys? they are the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and Salafies. The few other members of the parliament who are obviously against SCAF were included so the general public wont notice that there is something wrong and that the parliament consists of only the so called islamists, since they aren't that popular.
The fact remains the the MB along with the Salafies are obviously on SCAF's side. Lets take for example today's session, when some of the members of parliaments (MB and Salafiies) denied that the police where using bird shot against the protesters. Also when another member said that the protesters in front of the Ministry of Interior are being paid 200 LE a day along with 2 meals and Tramadol pills to destroy the country. Lets not forget the legendary session after the Ultras massacre when they decided to do send a fact finding committee to investigate what happened and nothing else, this is SCAF's style in dealing with anything; they didn't take any revolutionary decision like for example impeaching SCAF which they could have done and they would have been backed by the Egyptians.
As I said before SCAF wont give any real power to their opposition, and its very clear that the MB and Salafy members of the parliament are on SCAF's side. This raises a whole other issue of whether the parliamentary elections were fraudulent or not. I totally believe that the elections were fraudulent to some extent, the number of votes for all the candidates was tampered with. Votes for the Salafies and MB were increases while votes for the opposition were decreased so they will only form a minority of the parliament.
Some people may ask why did SCAF agree then to the parliamentary elections? the answer is easy, its to shut us the hell up. Did you ever see a kid crying and just being plain noisy that he's getting everyone's attention? then the kids mum gives him a lollipop to shut him up and it works the kid stops crying and is happy. Well we are the kid and our treat was the parliament
I don't believe in the Egyptian parliament and I will never back them up; for this reason I completely refuse the idiotic suggestion that after we bring SCAF down we hand over the power the parliament. Yes civil disobedience will begin on February 11th, hopefully it will work and it will be the end of SCAF but we will not hand over rule to the parliament.
No comments:
Post a Comment